Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flow
Cancellation Conflict Flows for Provisioning Process
Figure 6
Final Narrative 3/12/97; supports NANC 1/31/97 Process Flows (Issue 0.11) and
Midwest 3/12/97 Issue 0.12
1. Is Old or New cancellation notification
missing or inaccurate?
At this point in the process flow, the
subscription status is cancel pending, because either the
Old or New Service Provider's cancellation notification is
missing or inaccurate. If the Old Service Provider's notification
is at fault, then proceed to step 2. If the New Service
Provider's notification is at fault, then proceed to step 4.
Note that the Cancellation Conflict process
flow will be reached only for "concurred"
subscriptions.
2. NPAC logs information, cancels transaction,
and notifies both Service Providers of cancellation with proper
cause code
If the Old Service Provider has not provided a
cancellation notification message to NPAC, in spite of a
Cancellation LSR sent from the New Service Provider and two
reminder messages from NPAC, then the subscription is immediately
canceled. NPAC notifies both Service Providers that the
subscription status has been updated to canceled, and will
place the proper cause code on the subscription's record.
To maintain continuity of service to the
End-user, both Service Providers must cancel all related internal
work orders, if they have not already done so.
3. END
The subscription status is canceled. If
the End-user still desires to port their telephone number, the
process must be re-started at the beginning of the Provisioning
process flow.
4. NPAC logs information, places subscription
in "conflict status" with proper conflict cause code,
and notifies both Service Providers
If the New Service Provider has not provided a
cancellation notification message to NPAC, in spite of a
Cancellation LSR sent from the Old Service Provider and a
reminder message from NPAC, then the subscription is placed in a conflict
state by NPAC. NPAC also writes the proper conflict cause code to
the subscription's record, and notifies both Service Providers,
with proper conflict cause code, of the change in status via the
SOA interface.
To maintain continuity of service to the
End-user, both Service Providers must suspend all related
internal work orders, if they have not already done so.
5. How does New Service Provider wish to
continue?
With the subscription in conflict, it is
only the New Service Provider who controls what happens to the
transaction. The New Service Provider will make a concerted
effort to contact the Old Service Provider prior to proceeding.
If the New Service Provider decides to cancel
the subscription, then proceed to step 6. If they decide to
proceed with the porting process, then go to step 10. If they do
nothing, then 30 calendar days after being placed in the conflict
state, NPAC automatically cancels the subscription in step 9.
6. New Service Provider notifies NPAC to cancel
subscription
The New Service Provider may decide to cancel
the subscription. If so, they notify NPAC of this decision.
7. NPAC logs information, cancels subscription,
removes it from Conflict, and notifies both Service Providers of
cancellation
Having been notified by the New Service
Provider to cancel the subscription, NPAC logs this information,
and changes the subscription status to canceled. Both
Service Providers are notified of the change in the subscription
status.
To maintain continuity of service to the
End-user, both Service Providers must cancel all related internal
work orders, if they have not already done so.
8. END
The subscription status is canceled. If
the End-user still desires to port their telephone number, the
process must be re-started at the beginning of the Provisioning
process flow.
9. NPAC waits for 30 calendar days, cancels
subscription, removes it from Conflict, and notifies both Service
Providers of time-out.
After no response from the New Service Provider
for 30 calendar days regarding this particular subscription, NPAC
changes its status to canceled and notifies both Service
Providers of the change in status via the SOA interface.
To maintain continuity of service to the
End-user, both Service Providers must be careful to cancel or
suspend all related internal work orders when subscriptions are
in the conflict state.
10. New Service Provider notifies NPAC to
remove subscription from Conflict status
The New Service Provider may chose to proceed
with the porting process, in spite of a cancellation message
received from the Old Service Provider. As both Service Providers
are presumably basing their actions on the End-user's request,
and each is apparently getting a different request from that
End-user, they should ensure have an accurate request.
If the New Service Provider decides to proceed
with the porting, they update the status of the subscription to pending.
It is the responsibility of the New Service
Provider to contact the Old Service Provider, to request that
related work orders which support the porting process are
performed. The Old Service Provider must support the porting
process.
11. NPAC notifies both Service Providers of
conflict off via SOA
NPAC notifies both Service Providers of the
change in subscription status. The porting process resumes as
normal, at tie-point BB.