• 
  
  
  From: 0002043758@mcimail.com
  To: BARRY.BISHOP <>, DONNA.NAVICKAS <>
  Cc: bob.angevine@telops.gte.com, lisamm@dimensional.com, 0004454263@mcimail.com,
  baca@attmail.com, bstruthe@icc084r1.state.il.us
  Subject: Proposed change NPAC functionality (delete old SP involvement)
  
  
  Donna,
  Barry,
  
  In a nutshell, MCI proposes the following changes to the provisioning
  process as it relates to NPAC functionality (the changes are preceded
  with an asterisk). There are four items:
  
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  New Service Provider sends Create message to NPAC [no change]
  
  * NPAC sends "FYI" message to "current" service provider showing
  TN, Due Date, New SP, and Reason (new, change, cancel)
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  New Service Provider sends Activate message to NPAC [no change]
  
  * NPAC compares with "due date" and, if prior to "due date," rejects activation.
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * NPAC accepts no messages (other than acknowledgement of "FYI" message)
  from "current" Service Provider.
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  With this change in NPAC operation, MCI agrees that the "due date"
  is the "FOC" date.
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  I don't have distribution lists handy; would you see that this gets
  to members of your teams. Thanks.
  
  Steve
  
  
• 
  
• 
  To Barry Bishop
  From Ed Elkin
  
  Barry Bishop,
  
  AT&T agrees with MCI's proposed changes to the Provision Service, and Cancellation, process flows. This gives the NPAC/SMS Committee, and Lockheed-Martin, one set of proposed changes to evaluate for impact.
  
  AT&T's proposed process flows, dated 11/26/96, are withdrawn.
  
  Please communicate this to the Operations & Implementation Committee, and the NPAC/SMS Committee Chairperson.
  
  Thanks,
  Ed Elkin