MIDWEST REGION LNP OPERATIONS TEAM
MEETING MINUTES FROM
SEPTEMBER 16, 1998
A conference call was held on September 16, 1998. The following people attended:
OC Jackson AT&T Sue Seitz Ameritech
Liz Coakley Ameritech Brent Struthers ICC
Darin Liston Sprint-Local Robin Meier Ameritech
NEXT MEETING:
We need to hold a conference call asap to resolve the Number pooling issues which were discussed in the conference call today, in particular the participants in the number pooling trial in 847. Please look at the dates listed below for availability. Ill schedule the date where the most people identify availability. If none of these dates look good, Ill submit additional dates.
10-2 AM or PM
10-5 AM or PM
10-12 Am or PM
10-15 10:00 AM or PM
10-16 AM or PM
Please respond via E-mail with your availability for a conference call at one of these times.
Agenda:
NUMBER POOLING
Three issues were discussed in todays meeting:
1.
The manual contamination flow agreement for aging needs to be changed. Previously the team agreed to extend aging for disconnected numbers to November 1, 1998.
The number pooling feature in release 1.4 will not be turned on until 1-19-99, with testing scheduled to complete 2-1-99. The group discussed a new date to extend aging. Two dates were discussed 2-1 and 2-15. It was decided to target 2-15 as the date to extend the aging of disconnected numbers, to allow for slipping of target dates. It was noted that we needed to have more of the number pooling participants to reach final agreement. Please plan to attend the next conference call to discuss and finalize this issue. It was also noted that in many cases this extends the aging period beyond normal time frames. Discussion felt this effected a small number of lines and was still the best solution.
2.
Disconnected pooled numbers. In the original October timeline no special arrangements were agreed to regarding numbers which disconnect in the pooled blocks. Three plus months have been added to the timeline and there is a greater potential for numbers to disconnect and will require special handling for aging. The team discussed the need for an agreement where companies will review the pooled blocks to monitor disconnects and manually give them the new aging time period. We need to determine if this is the best method, and how often a review should be conducted. Once a month, twice a month, once a week?
3.
LERG 1000 blocks indicator for 847. The LERG modification for the 1000 block indicator is not available until March 1999. Discussion took place for how this affects the 847 area. Questions discussed included:
It was decided we need to discuss this issue and come to common agreement.
These issues will be discussed on the next conference call.
LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE
A brief report out of the National Law Enforcement meeting was presented. Meeting minutes will be distributed when they become available.
ICC AGENDA ITEM for OCTOBER 1 MEETING
Brent Struthers ICC would like for companies to be prepared to report rollout schedules for code openings at the ICC meeting on October 1. Brent would like clarification from all companies on the code opening status. Example of items to be clarified: How are you handling code opening? Are all of your company codes LNP capable? If not, what is your schedule for rollout? General clarification on the whole issue.
CROSS REGIONAL MEETING
The meeting minutes from the August meeting were sent this week. Problems were encountered opening the file. When a new copy is received the meeting minutes will be sent out for review.
The agenda for the October 7th meeting is as follows:
OTHER DISCUSSIONS
Darin Liston gave a brief impromptu report from the WWISC (Wireline Wireless Integration Sub Committee) meeting.
At the meeting primarily the NANC flows were reviewed. Other key discussion items included:
Query differences
OBF- LSR forms/process
Statement of work for NPAC. WWISC wants enhancements included in release 2. There concern is there wont be enough time to test, as they have a flash cut. (Note: On this call it was thought that release 2 was closed.)
Wireless to Wireline has agreed to the time frames for wireline.
Wireline to Wireless time frames are not agreed to. Wireless feels they want to be able to program the phone at the time the customer is in the store, not ask the customer to come back at a later date.
NEXT MEETING
Please review the dates at the top of the minutes and respond with availability for the next meeting.
Robin Meier
Midwest Region LNP Operations Chair