Illinois
Limited Liability Corporation

Interim
Number Pooling Administrator
Request
For Proposal
November
18, 1997
1.0 General Information
 | 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1
Purpose of Request for Proposal
1.1.2 Use of RFP Information
1.1.3 Vendor's Information
1.1.4 Background
1.2 Impact of Federal Regulation and
Legislation on this Procurement
1.3 Eligibility to Submit Proposals
1.3.1 Neutral Third Party
1.3.2 Additional Qualifications
1.4 Preparation of Responses
1.4.1 Proposal Submission
1.4.2 Closing Date
1.4.3 Response Composition
1.4.4 Questions or Requests for
Additional Information
1.4.5 Acceptance Period
1.4.6 Contract Award
1.5 Additional Contractual Terms and
Conditions
1.6 Preparation of Proposal Response
1.6.1 Content Structure
1.6.2 Tab Content
1.7 Evaluation of Proposals
|
2.0 Overview of Responsibilities
 | 2.1 General Responsibilities 2.2 Allocation Process Flow
2.3 Pooling Scope
2.4 Pooling Resources
2.5 Forecasting Requirements
2.6 Access to the Pool
2.7 Reports
2.8 Audits
2.9 Interface With the Code
Administrator
|
3.0 Miscellaneous Requirements
 | 3.1 Hours of Operation 3.2 Communications Requirements
3.3 Security Requirements
3.4 Staffing Requirements
|
4.0 Requirements Checklist
5.0 Pricing
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
1.0
General Information
1.1
Introduction
1.1.1 Purpose of
Request for Proposal
 |
 | The purpose of
this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to invite
interested parties to provide a firm pricing
proposal to support the number administration
function associated with the testing of number
pooling in the 847 area code and possibly, the
eventual implementation throughout the Chicago
MSA. Your response should be based upon the
specifications provided in this RFP and should
contain detailed information on degree of
compliance to requirements, pricing and
availability. The Selection
Committee, consisting of local service providers
participating in the Illinois Limited Liability
Corporation, will evaluate all proposals from an
overall numbering administration and operations
perspective to ensure integration with existing
code administration and number portability
operating procedures. Proposals will also be
assessed on their ability to evolve, as
necessary, from initially serving a limited
geographic area to one which may eventually
encompass the entire five-state area served by
the Midwest Regional Number Portability
Administration Center (NPAC) (i.e., Illinois,
Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin).
Prior to
the award of business, prospective vendors may be
required to furnish components of their systems
to the Selection Committee for evaluation and
testing and/or to make arrangements on their own
premises for facilitating joint testing, at no
charge.
|
|
1.1.2 Use of RFP
Information
 |
 | All vendors
shall use this RFP and any other information
furnished to you under this RFP solely for the
purposes of responding to this RFP. All such
documents and information you receive shall
remain the property of the Selection Committee,
shall be kept confidential and shall be returned
to the Selection Committee upon request.
Reproduction of any part of this RFP is
authorized only for the preparation of your
response. |
|
1.1.3 Vendor's
Information
 |
 | The Selection
Committees expectation is that most, or
all, of the response to the RFP would not be
proprietary in nature with the exception of
pricing (Section 5). Any information the bidder
wishes to be considered confidential must be
marked as such. Any information not marked as
such will be considered nonproprietary. If any
information is marked as confidential, bidder may
be asked to provide a non-proprietary version of
their response at a later date. |
|
1.1.4 Background
 |
 |
 |
 | 1.1.4.1
History of Number Pooling
Activities in Illinois to Date The
Illinois NANP Code Administrator
has projected the exhaust of
assignable Central Office codes
(NXXs) within the 847 area code
(NPA) to occur as early as the
end of the second quarter of
1998. In anticipation of this
exhaust, several meetings and
conference calls have been
conducted among
Telecommunications Industry
Representatives and stakeholders
to identify feasible alternatives
to address this exhaust
situation. The initial focus of
these meetings was to analyze
either an NPA split or an NPA
overlay. An NPA split would
reduce the area of coverage for
the 847 area code, and introduce
a new NPA code to serve the
vacated portion. The latter would
introduce a second area code
within the same 847 NPA boundary,
to serve all new customers of
telecommunications services once
the 847 area code was at total
exhaust.
It
was acknowledged that in a
multiple NPA environment, each
subsequent split diminishes the
actual area of relief, and leaves
other surrounding area codes with
similar exhaust potential. NPA
overlays offer the potential for
wider areas of relief, since
overlays can be used for more
than one area code. However,
overlays require mandatory
10-digit dialing within the
affected area, even for calls
within the same NPA.
In
May, 1997, the Citizens Utility
Board (CUB) proposed a third
alternative, which utilized the
soon-to-be-deployed local number
portability (LNP) technology to
offer a form of number pooling.
The ATIS-sponsored Industry
Numbering Committee (INC)
describes Number Pooling as:
 |
 | Pooling
of geographic numbers in
a local environment is a
number administration and
assignment process which
allocates numbering
resources to a shared
reservoir associated with
a designated geographic
area. |
|
Based
upon an AT&T proposal under
study within several industry
forums (i.e., NXX-X/LRN), this
alternative would allow
individual carriers serving the
same rate center area to be
allocated blocks of 1,000 numbers
from the 10,000 available within
the same NXX to serve new
customers.
The
Illinois Number Portability
Workshop (The Workshop) assigned
responsibility for assessing the
feasibility and practicality of
implementing this form of number
pooling as an appropriate relief
alternative for the 847 NPA to
the newly-formed Number Pooling
Subcommittee. Specifically, they
were directed to determine
whether the CUB/AT&T proposal
could be implemented on or around
1/1/98 to relieve the 847 NPA.
Although several concerns were
identified with number pooling,
most notably the strain on
existing administrative support
systems and LNP data base record
capacities, all six
facilities-based service
providers operating within the
847 NPA have agreed to begin a
trial on that date.
1.1.4.2
Role of the NXX in the North
American Numbering Plan
The
telephone numbering system used
in North American countries is
defined by the North American
Numbering Plan (NANP). This Plan
defines a 10-digit telephone
number format of NPA-NXX-XXXX.
The NPA (Numbering Plan Area) is
more commonly known as the area
code. The NXX identifies the
central office (CO) switch or CO
code to which the XXXX or line
number is assigned. In the NXX
and XXXX, N can be any digit from
2 through 9, and X any digit from
0 through 9. Taken together, the
NPA-NXX code combination is used
to route calls within the public
switched telephone network to
line numbers on specific
switches.
The
NPA-NXX also performs a second
function, which is call rating.
Each NPA-NXX is associated with a
specific geographic area within
an NPA to which are assigned
horizontal and vertical
coordinates. These coordinates
are used to determine the
distance of a call between
geographic areas of the
originating and terminating
numbers. A group of NXXs that
have the same coordinates form a
rate center. Historically, the
distance, length of call, and
time of day have been used to
determine the price of the call.
Such rating is done in real-time
on operator-assisted calls.
The
NPA-NXX performs yet a third
function. Historically, people
could distinguish between local
calls and toll calls they
originate by looking in the front
of their telephone books for the
list of NXXs that defined their
local calling area. When a call
is originated by a subscriber who
has presubscribed to an
interexchange carrier for
intraLATA toll calls, the
originating switch uses the
NPA-NXXs of the originating and
terminating numbers to determine,
in real-time, whether the call is
to be routed by the local service
provider (LSP) to the
presubscribed interexchange
carrier. This is commonly
referred to as toll
discrimination.
1.1.4.3
NXX-X/LRN
NXX-X/LRN
relies on the Location Routing
Number (LRN) used for LNP. The
NXX-X/LRN proposal conserves NXX
codes by sharing them across
several LSPs serving the same
rate center(s). All ten thousand
numbers within each NXX continue
to be assigned to one rate
center, but are shared among
multiple LSPs at the
thousands-block (NXX-X) level. An
example of this arrangement is
shown below:
847-999-1XXX
LSP-1
847-999-2XXX
LSP-2
847-999-3XXX
LSP-3
etc.
Therefore,
LSP-1, LSP-2, LSP-3, etc., can
each assign numbers from their
designated thousands-block within
the 847-999 NPA-NXX, but only to
customers residing within the
designated rate center.
Significantly,
the 847-999 NXX shown in the
example might still be assigned
in its entirety to one switch
entity/one LSP within the
Bellcore Local Exchange Routing
Guide (LERG). The assigned LSP
would be referred to as the code
holder. The code holder, however,
would only be permitted to assign
numbers within the particular
thousands-block or blocks that
have been allocated to it. Other
LSPs (blockholders) can assign
numbers in their designated
thousands-blocks, but must treat
the assigned numbers as ported,
and must populate them in the
NPAC Service Management System
(SMS).
|
|
|
|
1.2 Impact of
Federal Regulation and Legislation on this Procurement
This RFP is being issued by
a group of service providers who currently provide or intend to
provide facilities-based local exchange services in the state of
Illinois. Number administration is subject to oversight by the
Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC). However, bidders should be
aware that the Federal government, through Congressional
legislation, Federal Communications Commission rule making, or
other mandates, may establish policies for number pooling which
may affect the decision of the Selection Committee. As such, this
RFP currently requests bids for an interim pooling administrator
until, or unless, a national pooling administrator is selected.
1.3
Eligibility to Submit Proposals
1.3.1 Neutral Third
Party
 |
 | The Interim
Pooling Administrator business shall be awarded
to a "neutral third party." A neutral
third party is an entity which: |
|
- is not a
telecommunications service provider. A
telecommunications service provider is an entity
which provides, for generally-available public
use, the transmission of information by
electromagnetic or optical means;
- is not owned
by, or does not own, any telecommunications
service provider. Ownership interests of five
percent (5%) or less shall not be considered
ownership for purposes of this section;
- is not
affiliated, by common ownership or otherwise,
with a telecommunications service provider.
1.3.2 Additional
Qualifications
 |
 |
 |
 | 1.3.2.1
General Background of Bidder(s) RFP
responses shall contain a concise
description of the principal
business of the bidder and any
subcontractors, including such
items as company background,
characteristics of business
strength, performance support for
what could potentially be a
multi-year, multi-state business
award, accomplishments and
capabilities which demonstrate a
strong foundation for managing
and administering NANP resources,
policies and procedures that will
ensure evenhanded treatment of
all carriers, and certification
that the bidder and any
subcontractor shall comply with
the provisions of this Section.
1.3.2.2
Industry Experience
RFP
proposals shall include a concise
description of the
telecommunications experience of
the bidder and any
subcontractors, including such
items as products and services
offered, customers served,
successful performance of the
functional skills required by
this RFP on activities performed
for other customers, and customer
benefits that resulted from such
successful performance.
1.3.2.3
Financial Stability
RFP
proposals shall include a concise
description of the financial
condition of the bidder and any
subcontractors. Responses should
include the most recent annual
report or audited financial
statement of the bidder and any
subcontractors. Proposals shall
include all characteristics of
bidder(s) financial strength to
support what could potentially be
a multi-year, multi-state
business award.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
- Subcontractors
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Responses
to this RFP shall clearly state
the roles and responsibilities of
any and all subcontractors which
vendors are proposing to use in
performing any work associated
with an award of business
pursuant to this RFP. |
|
|
|
1.4
Preparation of Responses
1.4.1 Proposal
Submission
 |
 | Your proposal,
complete in all respects, must be submitted to
the following address: Eric J. Rasmussen
Ameritech
2000 W.
Ameritech Center Drive, Room 4C87A
Hoffman
Estates, Illinois 60196
Your cover
letter should include the name(s), phone
number(s) and fax number(s) of the individual(s)
within your company who should be contacted in
case any questions should arise during the
evaluation of your proposal.
Failure to
direct your response to the address given above
by the noted closing date may result in the
disqualification of your proposal.
The package
containing your proposal shall be marked
"Sealed Proposal" with this RFP title
and your company's name.
|
|
1.4.2 Closing Date
 |
 | All proposals
in response to this RFP shall be received NO
LATER THAN 12:00 Noon (Central Standard Time), December
16, 1997. |
|
1.4.3 Response
Composition
 |
 | You shall
submit ten (10) sets (hard copy and diskette copy
in IBM DOS format, MS Word /Excel 4.0) of copies
of your proposal. Please mark all pages of one
(1) paper copy "Master Copy". If
discrepancies between copies and/or the diskette
are found, the "Master Copy" will
govern. Your proposal shall
be typed double spaced on 8-1/2" x 11"
3-hole punched paper with each volume beginning
on a new page and separately tabbed.
You are
requested not to make your proposal elaborate
with respect to binding or presentation. A
simple, straightforward, economically reproduced
proposal is strongly recommended. Our proposal
evaluation procedure places a higher premium on
thoroughness of presentation, i.e.,
responsiveness, rather than on quantity of
material included.
|
|
1.4.4 Questions or
Requests for Additional Information
 |
 | Submit your
question(s) or request(s) for additional
information in writing to the following facsimile
number listed below no later than December 2,
1997 prior to the closing date for this RFP. Bidders wishing
their questions to remain confidential should
mark them as such. Otherwise, it is the intention
of the Selection Committee to share both the
questions and subsequent responses with all
potential bidders. This will be handled by
posting those Q&As on the Illinois LNP
website at www.ported.com. The identity of the
requesting company shall be withheld. Telephone
inquiries will not be accommodated.
All
questions shall be submitted by fax to:
Fax:
847-248-3284
The
Selection Committee reserves the right to request
additional information or clarification from all
bidders on the bids received. Bidders must submit
written responses to such requests within one
week upon receipt of request from the Selection
Committee.
|
|
1.4.5 Acceptance
Period
 |
 | Your proposal
shall indicate that it is valid for a period of
at least one hundred eighty (180) days from the
Closing Date. |
|
1.4.6 Contract
Award
 |
 | The
contracting entity or entities of the Selection
Committee reserve the right:
 |
 |
 | a)
to reject any and all
responses; b)
to conduct negotiations
with more than one bidder
simultaneously;
c)
to add, delete and/or
change the terms of this
RFP and to issue
corrections and
amendments to the RFP;
d)
to accept or reject, in
whole or in part, any
response without giving
any reason for the
decision;
e)
to enter into a
contractual arrangement
with any bidder and is
not limited by any event
associated with this RFP;
f)
to have any documents
submitted by a bidder
reviewed and evaluated by
any individuals,
including, independent
consultants;
|
|
|
and
|
|
 |
 |
- to
cancel the RFP process without
penalty at any time before a
written contract is entered into.
|
|
No contractual
obligations are assumed by issuing the RFP, receiving, accepting,
and evaluating the bidders response, and/or making a
preliminary bidder selection.
The Selection Committee
reserves the right to cancel any agreement if the services or
facilities do not pass mutually agreeable acceptance tests. This
will be done at no cost or obligation to the Selection Committee
contracting entity or entities.
The Selection Committee
contracting entity or entities reserve the right to negotiate all
terms and conditions in order to enter into a formal agreement
with the successful bidder. This document, the bidders
response, and full system documentation will form part of the
agreement.
No publicity or news
releases pertaining to this RFP, responses to this RFP,
discussions of any kind regarding the RFP, or the award of any
agreement related to the bid document may be released without the
prior written approval of the Selection Committee.
All work and materials
must comply with all federal and state law, municipal ordinances,
regulations, and directions of inspectors appointed by proper
authorities having jurisdiction.
The bidder shall not
assign, transfer, or sublet the RFP service agreement or any
interest therein or any part thereof without prior written
consent. All subcontractors must be identified and approved prior
to disclosure of any information. If subcontracting is involved,
the bidder shall be responsible for the workmanship, costs, etc.
incurred by the sub-contractor in the performance of their
duties.
The bidder, by stating
compliance to a requirement in this RFP, agrees that the vendor
has read and understood the requirement and that compliance is
complete and deliverable at no additional cost unless otherwise
noted.
This RFP may include
unintended errors, omissions, and/or deficiencies. Therefore, the
accuracy and completeness of this document and related documents
are not guaranteed. In the event that such errors, omissions,
and/or deficiencies are discovered by the bidder, the bidder
shall notify the Selection Committee in writing within 48 hours.
The bidder is expected
to examine the specifications and instructions carefully.
Calculation errors shall be the bidders risk. In the event
of a bidders error in price, time or calculations, quoted
items shall prevail.
1.5
Additional Contractual Terms and Conditions
This section identifies
contractual terms and conditions that the contracting entity
intends to incorporate into the Agreement. The following list is
in addition to the terms and conditions specified in the RFP, and
in no event be considered all encompassing.
 |
 | 1. Conformity
with Law Bidder shall comply
with all applicable FCC rules and federal, state,
and local statutes, regulations and case law.
2.
Indemnification
Bidder
shall provide indemnification with regard to
damage, death, or personal injury due to
bidders acts or omissions.
3.
Trademarks and Publicity
Bidders
shall have no rights to use names or trademarks.
4.
Confidentiality
Bidder
shall not disclose confidential information.
5.
Termination
The
Agreement shall establish the right of
termination without liability if bidder
substantially defaults in performing obligations.
6.
Limitation of Liability
Except
specifically provided in the Agreement, there
shall be no liability for bidders damages.
7. Taxes
Bidders
shall file all tax returns required by law to be
filed by bidder: bidder shall provide access to
relevant documents for tax audits.
8.
Insurance
Bidder
shall maintain workers compensation
insurance, employers liability insurance,
comprehensive general liability insurance, and
motor vehicle insurance.
9.
Authority
Bidder
shall represent and warrant that bidder has
approval and authority to execute the Agreement.
10.
Mechanics Lien
Bidder
shall perform services free of mechanics
lien or other liens.
|
|
- Performance
Guarantees/Liquidated Damages
 |
 | Any award of
business and subsequent contractual arrangement
will include specific performance guarantees from
the vendor. Such performance will be guaranteed
through the use of liquidated damages. |
|
1.6
Preparation of Proposal Response
1.6.1 Content
Structure
 |
 | You are
responsible for any and all costs incurred in the
preparation of your response to this RFP. Your
proposal shall consist of the following separate
Tabs:
 |
 |
 | Tab
1 Proposal Summary Tab
2 Functional and
Technical Requirements
Tab
3 Cost and Price
|
|
|
DO NOT
INCLUDE COST OR PRICE FIGURES ANYWHERE EXCEPT IN
YOUR TAB 3 RESPONSE, THE COST AND PRICE SECTION.
Proposals
must specifically state how the bidder intends to
meet each individual requirement of the RFP, as
outlined in Section 4. Responses such as "in
compliance," or "fully complies,"
etc., are not acceptable. All proposals meeting
the stated requirements and specifications except
for minor exceptions and deviations, shall be
considered. Failure to meet requirements may
disqualify a proposal from the selection process.
However, proposals having minor exceptions and
deviations shall be considered only if the
following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
1.6.2 Tab Content
1.7
Evaluation of Proposals
The criteria to be used for
the proposal evaluation include:
 |
 | (a) technical
merit (b)
delivery timeframes/availability
(c) price
and cost
(d) quality
considerations
(e)
responsiveness to contract provisions
(f)
Bidders financial stability, history,
including program management
|
|
No weighting or relative
importance of criteria is intended or implied by this list.
You shall furnish all
information as requested per the applicable instructions
providing sufficient data to enable us to evaluate the proposal.
Any deviations or exceptions to the RFP should be noted. Any
supplier who does not completely reply to the proposal as
requested may be eliminated at the discretion of Selection
Committee.
The same article, section
or paragraph number and title used in the RFP shall be used for
your comments.
In the cases where your
reply is "will not be complied with" or "not
agreed to", you shall indicate your reasons for such
disagreement and provide an alternative with which you will
comply or agree.
2.0
Overview of Responsibilities
The following information
provides detail on how the Interim Pooling Administrator is
intended to interact with the various business processes
associated with number pooling and number portability. This
information is intended to provide an overview of the role of the
Interim Pooling Administrator in number pooling/portability.
Details of steps in the processes that do not involve the Interim
Pooling Administrator, such as interactions between service
providers, will be determined by the service providers and are
beyond the scope of this document. Specific requirements
generated by the process flows are included in the appropriate
sections later in the document. (Section 4.0)
2.1 General
Responsibilities
The Number Pooling
Subcommittee has identified the following set of responsibilities
which are to be assumed by the Interim Pooling Administrator:
 | Monitor and replenish
the pool of available blocks to be shared among service
providers |
 | Process all requests
for new or additional blocks of numbers |
 | Allocate blocks to
requesting providers, using guidelines established for
this purpose |
 | Notify the industry of
all block allocations |
 | Coordinate the
management of pooled blocks with the Code Administrator |
 | Prepare and publish
appropriate industry reports |
 | Conduct audits of
service provider number utilization as necessary, in
accordance with regulatory requirements and/or industry
guidelines |
These responsibilities will
be further defined in the sections that follow.
2.2
Allocation Process Flow
This process flow defines
the provisioning flow in which a service provider requests and is
allocated a block of telephone numbers within the designated
pool.
The service provider will
submit a request, using a yet-to-be-defined standard form, to the
Interim Pooling Administrator (the Administrator), asking for one
or more blocks of one thousand (1000) consecutive numbers from
the pool. The request may be for a specific thousands-block(s)
that the service provider had previously determined to be
available. Upon receipt of the request, the Administrator will
follow the procedures outlined within the Illinois Pooling
Administration Guidelines to check the validity of the request
and eligibility of the requesting service provider. Once validity
and eligibility is confirmed, the Administrator will notify the
requesting provider, the assignee, and the NPAC, of which
block(s) has been allocated to accommodate the request. The block
and code assignees will send appropriate notification and
confirmation messages, as outlined in the NANC Functional
Requirements Specifications (FRS) business process flows, to the
NPAC from their Service Order Administration Systems.
2.3 Pooling
Scope
The Chicago-area service
providers will conduct a trial of number pooling, using the
NXX-X/LRN method, beginning on or around January 1, 1998. The
trial will determine the feasibility and practicality of using
number pooling at the thousands-block level to extend the life of
a working NPA. The trial will be limited to wireline service
providers serving customers within the 847 area code, and will
employ the pre-porting methodology for storing allocated numbers
within LNP data bases. Due to the data base capacity concern, it
has been suggested that pooling be initially limited to within
the trial NPA until a proposed enhancement to service provider
SCPs is generally available. Since several SCP vendors have
indicated that this enhancement could be offered in 3Q or 4Q98,
it is anticipated that pooling may expand to other Chicago-area
NPAs on or around that timeframe. Due to the uncertainty of the
length of the trial period, and the timing and impact of any NANC
recommendation for a permanent Pooling Administrator, bidders are
encouraged to provide separate proposals and prices for the
administration of pooling within 847 and subsequent NPAs. To
assist bidders in developing prices, Attachment B provides the
aggregate number of thousands blocks, by quarter for the 847 NPA,
that were forecasted by wireline service providers in July 1997.
The Selection Committee makes no representation as to the
accuracy of this forecast, but offers it as a model of the
activity that the bidder may expect to experience.
2.4 Pooling
Resources
Blocks of telephone numbers
allocated to the pool will initially come from spare or
sparsely-assigned thousands-blocks within NXXs from the 847 NPA
which were previously allocated to wireline service providers.
The Illinois Commerce Commission Staff is presently monitoring
usage within those blocks identified as potential pooling
candidates from a survey conducted in May, 1997. Service
providers have been requested to limit or restrict assignment
within those blocks, so that they can be returned to the pool
upon the start date of number pooling. Upon activation of the
pool, the Administrator assume responsibility for monitoring the
number of available blocks within each rate center, and taking
specific measures to ensure that a sufficient supply of such
blocks are available to meet the forecasted demand.
The Administrator will be
responsible for continuously comparing the number of available
blocks within each rate center, with the aggregated service
provider forecasts, addressed in Section 2.5, for those same
numbering resources. Ninety days prior to the anticipated exhaust
of available blocks within a given rate center, the Administrator
will contact one or more of the service providers that had
forecasted a future demand for blocks within that rate center,
and request that one of them volunteer to become the new NXX
assignee. Once a volunteer is identified, the Administrator will
coordinate with that service provider and the Code Administrator
to assign a new NXX, allocate one thousands-block within to the
service provider, and replenish the pool with all remaining
blocks.
2.5
Forecasting Requirements
The Administrator will be
responsible for requesting and aggregating quarterly ongoing,
two-year forecasts from each service provider that identifies
projected block demand by rate center. Such forecasts will be
treated as confidential and (service provider) proprietary, with
disclosure provided only in aggregate form, in a manner that
fully masks the identity of the forecasting entity.
2.6 Access to
the Pool
The Administrator will be
responsible for providing service providers with a means (e.g.
website, dial-up access)for reviewing currently-available blocks
within the pool, for pre-selection purposes. The actual method
used will be subject to negotiation, balancing, in the
short-term, the desire for near real-time access with cost
minimization. Bidders proposals should include a
methodology for providing access to block availability
information.
2.7 Reports
The Administrator will be
responsible for notifying all service providers within the
pooling area whenever blocks are allocated using the form shown
in attachment A. In addition, the Administrator will prepare and
forward any reports deemed necessary and appropriate by the
industry and/or state and federal regulators. It is anticipated
that such reports may include COCUS-like reports, which will
require close coordination with the Code Administrator.
2.8 Audits
The Administrator will be
responsible for conducting audits, as necessary of the number
utilization within blocks previously allocated to each service
provider. Such audits will be conducted in accordance with the
Illinois Pooling Administration Guidelines. In addition, the
Administrator will assume responsibility for conducting audits
deemed necessary by appropriate regulatory entities. All such
audits will be conducted in a confidential manner, in accordance
with Section 3.3.
2.9 Interface
With the Code Administrator
The administrator will be
responsible for coordinating with the Code Administrator to
assign new NXXs for the purpose of replenishing the pool of
available blocks within a given rate center. In addition, the
administrator will provide input and support to the code
administrator in projecting NPA exhaust.
3.0
Miscellaneous Requirements
3.1 Hours of
Operation
The Administrator shall be
available a minimum of five days a week, eight hours a day. The
Administrator must also provide a mechanism (e.g., voicemail,
e-mail, facsimile, etc.,) to be accessible on a 7-day, 24-hour
basis to fully meet the needs of the service providers. It is
expected that the Administrator will respond within one business
day to inquiries or questions submitted outside of normal
business hours. Responses to requests for block allocations will
be accommodated within the intervals specified in the Illinois
Pooling Administration Guidelines.
3.2
Communications Requirements
Each member of the
Administrators team must have an individual telephone
number. The phone system must provide the capability to allow the
caller to leave a message easily. This can be accomplished by an
electronic messaging system that allows the caller to leave a
message for the person called.
3.3 Security
Requirements
Due to the
proprietary/sensitive nature of the information managed by the
Administrator, proper security measures must be taken. This
includes the establishment of a secured work area with limited
access and secured record retention practices. In addition,
appropriate security will be required for any computer systems
containing forecasting, number assignment, auditing or applicant
information. This requirement includes any system that is
interconnected to any telecommunications network.
3.4 Staffing
Requirements
Staffing must be at an
appropriate level to ensure that the Administrator can
efficiently perform the functions identified in this RFP, and
provide timely responses. The Staff should be available in
accordance with Section 3.1. If situations warrant, the Staff
must also be available at other times deemed necessary to meet
the needs of the service providers.
The physical location of
the administration facility is at the discretion of the bidder.
However, the Staff must be able to travel, when necessary, to
meet the needs of the service providers (e.g., seminars,
regulatory hearings, NPA relief activities, etc.).
Proposed staffing profiles
and levels, as well as the physical location of the Staff, must
be part of the bidders response.
4.0
Requirements Checklist
| Requirement |
Description |
Compliance Information |
| R1.3.1 |
Neutral Third Party |
|
| R1.3.2.1 |
General Background |
|
| R1.3.2.2 |
Industry Experience |
|
| R1.3.2.3 |
Financial Stability |
|
| R2.2 |
Processing Requests for thousands-blocks
|
|
| R2.3 |
Separate proposals for 847
and subsequent
NPAs
|
|
| R2.4 |
Monitoring and replenishing the pool
|
|
| R2.5 |
Requesting and managing forecasts
|
|
| R2.6 |
Providing access to pooling data
|
|
| R2.7 |
Providing reports |
|
| R2.8 |
Conducting Audits |
|
| R2.8 |
Interfacing with the Code Administrator
|
|
| R3.1 |
Hours of operation |
|
| R3.2 |
Communications requirements |
|
| R3.3 |
Security |
|
| R3.4 |
Staffing levels |
|
5.0
Pricing
This Section is intended to
be used by the Bidder for providing specific pricing information,
in accordance with Section 1.6.
ATTACHMENT A
WORLD LETTER 98IL-00
847-XXX
In response to a request
from XYZ Telephone Company, dated 1/1/98 and received on 1/3/98,
the following number block(s) will be activated:
 |
 | NPA: NXX:
Block
Range(s):
CLLI:
Rate
Center:
Equipment
Type:
Effective
Date:
LATA:
LRN:
LERG OCN:
NPAC SPID:
DPC:
Usage
(e.g., POTS, DID):
Tandem:
NXX
Assignee:
NXX
Assignee CLLI:
Route
Similar To (e.g., working NPA/NXX):
7-Digit
Cross NPA (Y/N)?
Working/Reserved
Numbers within the range:
a)
Allocated to NXX Assignee:
b) Ported
to other service providers:
Administrator
Name:
Phone:
|
|
ATTACHMENT
B